It's not.Chadderandom wrote:[ I kept listening to it the whole week trying to figure out if it was any good
You, sir, are no Eugene Chadbourne.
I hope your work will improve.
It's not.Chadderandom wrote:[ I kept listening to it the whole week trying to figure out if it was any good
Acutally it's alot longer than 11 seconds. It's too bad you missed it. Yes, I'm being sarcastic. It was a stupid review.Rone Rivendale – Another eleven second song
That's a good point about that line. It was a close call between writing three completely different chorus "tags" or repeating the first chorus again at the end. I chose to repeat the first one because of its hopeful tone, and I wanted to the song to end on a hopeful note. Doing that made it more reasonable to bury the 'get me laid' in the middle.jackfrost wrote: I think the song should have ended on the “get my laid” line. That was the height of the joke, and in my opinion, the song should have ended on it.
Presumably: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uDDdxDKmNAThe Go Ahead And wrote: Also, what's "Lump"?
I guess I'm just dense. Besides that, though, I try and mix as I go, as much as I can. I mean, you still end up having to sit down and mix, but if you can tweak a little bit of this and a tad of that as you progress, it's a big help. Knowing what you want in the end helps as well also, although there's always a bit of wingin' it along the way. There's also a certain amount of 'formula' involved, I suppose, but that slowly evolves over time as well. Thanks for the comments, I'll get some posted in the next day or two.jackfrost wrote:I don’t know how you get such dense songs recorded in a week.
If I'd done more than one take that probably would've cleared that up.No Horse Town wrote:just embrace it and don't be so hesitant.
Billy's Little Trip wrote:I must have this....in my mouth.....now.
The lyrics are about a girl that one of my friends told me about, who goes on Yahoo! live and takes off her clothes in front of the webcam, gets banned by the moderators, and then comes back under a different name to do it again. She keeps her face covered, though. The one time was curious enough to check it out she was wearing a Middle Eastern-type scarf over face and playing with a (hopefully fake) machine gun. I didn't stick around long enough for her to take off her clothes; apparently it involves a lot of waiting, sometimes for days.Paco Del Stinko wrote: Flvxxvm Florvm - Where did this feel come from? Very Carlos Santana or something. I dig this direction and like the rubbery bass. Also the fuzzed out chorus. The song makes more sense after the first chorus, feel wise, as well. A nice change in the drums would be refreshing, but somehow the horse-trot feel gets away with working throughout. Care to share who this is about?
It's a love song... to a new car! Thanks for the review, my stinky compadre (and to everyone else who reviewed).Paco Del Stinko wrote:I'm a little head scratchy at the car bit...
Thank you for the positive review, I almost forgot what that felt like. I actually do ALOT of 'sad' romance songs. Not really sure why. I guess it's just easier to write. But I'm glad you liked it! This song was bascially a way to practice my guitar in public. I wish I could record it clearer.Rone Rivendale - "m'clothes", that was funny. So is the end. But, I wish this song wasn't funny. To me, it feels like a really depressing song, way more so than "sad songs" which howl and cry and emote so damn much.. so, yeah, I wish it was just that. But it seems like it's kind of a joke, which is cool I guess, but, yeah. It's NOT monotone, and it's totally, uh, musical, but I think a lot of people will have a hard time seeing that. As for me, I kinda liked it. Kinda.
LOL, yes that was my guitar. I couldn't get it to record very clearly. Plus I lost my only pick (got one now) and I suck at strumming with my fingers. I know it's a little bare as far as the whole package goes but I was going for a bare bones song because I just wanted to practice my guitar and didn't feel like dressing it up since it might have hidden the guitar too much. BTW, thank you for saying I'm capable of doing better vocals. It's not true, but I appreciate it!!Rone Rivendale - I just realized that the weird bell harmonics I was hearing, and couldn't figure out what they were, is a guitar! Tune that thing up, bro. Glad that you're trying a new instrument, though. What dark and bleak lyrics, some work well some don't. Some bass tones might've helped this, but I'm not so sure about that, as the entire song feels a bit rushed, evident in the overlapping and stuttery sounding vocal tracks. You can do better.
Paco Del Stinko wrote:LSK - Well, you get points for enthusiasm, but lose them for that brain punching snare. It's nice that it's real and all, but put that thing in a harness, please! The lyrics are way under-baked and display a lack of either effort or time, hopefully time. Step it up, man.
drë wrote:LSK : yippi for experimental music. dude, it would be so cool to lock someone up in a cold pitch dark room, and just loop this song over and over for like 24 hours.. see how insane you can make them. the melody part at :50 is pretty sweet.
MC Eric B wrote:LSK - Crazy sounding, but I like it. The problem is it needs more lyrics.
To answer the two most common complaints:PiGPEN wrote:lsk
Did you replace a snare with a pan?
That's fine, you gotta make the best of what you have. But maybe try experimenting with mic placement and EQ and all that - it's just a bit rough on the ears.LSK wrote:The recording was made with an actual snare. It was recorded with a $10 microphone placed atop the floor tom.
Thanks... I get "fragile" a lotPaco Del Stinko wrote:Clifton Lee Johnston - Where's the production? I'm kidding! ( I saw your comments somewhere) What a nice and delicate song. Very fragile, and appropriately so, given the lyrics. The melody is fine, if a bit standard, but the guitar part adds the soul, I think. Nicely done.
Ha, that makes it even funnier. I thought it was about a corpse. Great little ditty, either way.Paco Del Stinko wrote:Paco del Stinko - This is indeed about a blow-up/ sex doll. YES, an auto-biographical story, thank you very much.