Long fights

Use this forum for title suggestions, bitching at moderators, whining about phpBB, and grand ideas that will solve all of Song Fight's problems.
User avatar
Jim of Seattle
Ice Cream Man
Posts: 1360
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:33 am
Instruments: Keyboards
Recording Method: Cakewalk, EastWest Play, Adobe Audition, Windows
Submitting as: Jim of Seattle, Ants (Invisible), Madi Singer/Songwriter, Restless Events
Contact:

Long fights

Post by Jim of Seattle »

My suggestions is that maybe 3-4 times a year there is are longer fights whose deadlines are farther out, I think 3 weeks would be about right. There are a number of benefits of such an idea:
  • * Gives people for whom the one week deadline is an insurmountable hurdle, such as hobby bands who meet infrequently (usually due to the members' busy schedules) a chance to participate
    * Gives 'fighters a chance to work on something they can put more time into
    * Gives people with unpredictable schedules a chance to finish something they started when their unpredictable schedules get in the way unexpectedly
    * Gives the fightmasters a chance for a little vacation
Imprtantly, these long fights should be pre-announced, (like on the main page, there is an announcement that an extra long fight is scheduled for early January, for example) so people could plan for them and/or anticipate them, and arrange their schedules accordingly. For me, that would mean I could know that I would be able to enter that fight then and look forward to it and plan around it. As it is, I can so rarely fight just because I usually can't carve out enough time in a week to do anything. If I knew in advance I could sort of not plan any other big projects that time.

I evangelize songfight all the time, whenever the subject of songwriting comes up. So I'm pretty used to the conversation. I notice a lot of time people who are considering participating are frequently turned off by the one-week timeline, coming back with things like "Oh, well our band doesn't meet often enough to enable us to really put anything together in a week, but sounds fun. Oh well." And I always have to nod my head because I know the problem.

Anyone else think this is a good idea, like once every 3-4 months?
User avatar
fluffy
Eruption
Posts: 11028
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:56 am
Instruments: sometimes
Recording Method: Logic Pro X
Submitting as: Sockpuppet
Pronouns: she/they
Location: Seattle-ish
Contact:

Post by fluffy »

Or maybe have an ongoing "longfight" running in parallel with the usual goings-on, to replace the dearly-departed green fight.
User avatar
Jim of Seattle
Ice Cream Man
Posts: 1360
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:33 am
Instruments: Keyboards
Recording Method: Cakewalk, EastWest Play, Adobe Audition, Windows
Submitting as: Jim of Seattle, Ants (Invisible), Madi Singer/Songwriter, Restless Events
Contact:

Post by Jim of Seattle »

Yeah, that would work too, of course that would create even MORE work for the fightmasters...

Another benefit of the long fight would be to foster new online collaborations, which take more time. I think most of us have these maybe-someday collabs in our back pocket which we'd love to do actually get a chance to do other than in side projects.
User avatar
fluffy
Eruption
Posts: 11028
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:56 am
Instruments: sometimes
Recording Method: Logic Pro X
Submitting as: Sockpuppet
Pronouns: she/they
Location: Seattle-ish
Contact:

Post by fluffy »

Would it really be much more work to have three fights but to only update one of them every three weeks?
j$
Beat It
Posts: 5348
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:33 am
Instruments: Bass, keyboards, singin', guitar
Submitting as: Johnny Cashpoint
Location: London, Engerllaaannnddd
Contact:

Post by j$ »

This is in no way knocking the idea of long fights, which is intriguing, but practically, do you not think you're going to get a large proportion of people who just knock it out with a week to go? Or finish it in a week and sit on it for three weeks? Remixfight runs a month long deadline across two remixes, and generally speaking most people are 'finished' early or racing for the deadline.

Even if you have a sign-up, that's no guarantee that people won't do that - which possibly negate sthe purpose. Also, the longer the fight, i think, the more likely that people will drop out at the last minute. Especially as more pressing demands (like SF) take up their time.

Like I said, not knocking the idea - I just wonder what the demand would be? I guess we'll find out ....

j$
User avatar
jb
Hot for Teacher
Posts: 4159
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:12 am
Instruments: Guitar, Cello, Keys, Uke, Vox, Perc
Recording Method: Logic X
Submitting as: The John Benjamin Band
Pronouns: he/him
Location: WASHINGTON, DC
Contact:

Post by jb »

fluffy wrote:Would it really be much more work to have three fights but to only update one of them every three weeks?
YES
blippity blop ya don’t stop heyyyyyyyyy
User avatar
Jim of Seattle
Ice Cream Man
Posts: 1360
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:33 am
Instruments: Keyboards
Recording Method: Cakewalk, EastWest Play, Adobe Audition, Windows
Submitting as: Jim of Seattle, Ants (Invisible), Madi Singer/Songwriter, Restless Events
Contact:

Post by Jim of Seattle »

J$, the point of the long fight, at least as I see it, is more to allow people who otherwise find it hard to participate the time they need, rather than to induce people the people who can whip them out anyway to spend more time on their songs.
User avatar
Jim of Seattle
Ice Cream Man
Posts: 1360
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:33 am
Instruments: Keyboards
Recording Method: Cakewalk, EastWest Play, Adobe Audition, Windows
Submitting as: Jim of Seattle, Ants (Invisible), Madi Singer/Songwriter, Restless Events
Contact:

Post by Jim of Seattle »

Another way to implement this idea, with overall less impact on the regular fight flow, would be to announce one title 2 weeks early. It would be announced as a "long fight". 2 weeks later, that long fight title would be listed in its proper place (red, green, or blue), the only difference is that it would have been known 2 weeks earlier. That method requires almost no extra FM work, other than the early title announcement (in the News section, perhaps), and also wouldn't upset anyone married to the week-long fight format.
User avatar
erik
Jump
Posts: 2341
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:06 am
Submitting as: 15-16 puzzle
Location: Austin
Contact:

Re: Long fights

Post by erik »

Jim of Seattle wrote:Anyone else think this is a good idea, like once every 3-4 months?
Wait, aren't you the pollmaster? A brilliant chance to make a poll is lost.

I don't see any need to implement this idea.
User avatar
Jim of Seattle
Ice Cream Man
Posts: 1360
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:33 am
Instruments: Keyboards
Recording Method: Cakewalk, EastWest Play, Adobe Audition, Windows
Submitting as: Jim of Seattle, Ants (Invisible), Madi Singer/Songwriter, Restless Events
Contact:

Post by Jim of Seattle »

Another way to implement this idea, with overall less impact on the regular fight flow, would be to announce one title 2 weeks early. It would be announced as a "long fight". 2 weeks later, that long fight title would be listed in its proper place (red, green, or blue), the only difference is that it would have been known 2 weeks earlier. That method requires almost no extra FM work, other than the early title announcement (in the News section, perhaps), and also wouldn't upset anyone married to the week-long fight format.
Eric Y.
Ice Cream Man
Posts: 1797
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 12:36 pm

Post by Eric Y. »

i think somebody already suggested that...
User avatar
erik
Jump
Posts: 2341
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:06 am
Submitting as: 15-16 puzzle
Location: Austin
Contact:

Post by erik »

HOLY CRAP I THINK IM IN THE MATRIX

GET ME TO A LANDLINE
User avatar
Leaf
Jump
Posts: 2438
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 2:19 pm
Instruments: Drums, guitar, bass, vocals.
Recording Method: Cubase
Submitting as: Leaf 62, Gert, Boon Liver, Leaf and Twig, Tom Skillman, A bunch of other stuff.
Location: Campbell River, B.C.
Contact:

Post by Leaf »

Jimmy two-two and the posted tang.
User avatar
Jim of Seattle
Ice Cream Man
Posts: 1360
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:33 am
Instruments: Keyboards
Recording Method: Cakewalk, EastWest Play, Adobe Audition, Windows
Submitting as: Jim of Seattle, Ants (Invisible), Madi Singer/Songwriter, Restless Events
Contact:

Re: Long fights

Post by Jim of Seattle »

15-16 puzzle wrote:
I don't see any need to implement this idea.
That's awfully dismissive of you. Why not? I think I've made a pretty compelling case for it adding a lot of value and with an extremely low impact to the regular fight process.
User avatar
ken
Hot for Teacher
Posts: 3869
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 6:10 pm
Instruments: Guitar, bass, drums, keys
Recording Method: MOTU 828x, Cubase 10
Submitting as: Ken's Super Duper Band 'n Stuff
Pronouns: he/him
Location: oakland, ca
Contact:

Post by ken »

I remember that fights were mostly two weeks when I first started songfight. I would write the song the first week, and work on the arrangement the second. It was a nice pace.

Be well,
Ken
Ken's Super Duper Band 'n Stuff - Berkeley Social Scene - Tiny Robots - Seamus Collective - Semolina Pilchards - Cutie Pies - Explino! - Bravo Bros. - 2 from 14 - and more!

i would just like to remind everyone that Ken eats kittens - blue lang
User avatar
fluffy
Eruption
Posts: 11028
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:56 am
Instruments: sometimes
Recording Method: Logic Pro X
Submitting as: Sockpuppet
Pronouns: she/they
Location: Seattle-ish
Contact:

Post by fluffy »

Yeah, and when I first got here it was usually 2-3 weeks for the recording/submitting, and there wouldn't be a pending title during the song vote.
User avatar
erik
Jump
Posts: 2341
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:06 am
Submitting as: 15-16 puzzle
Location: Austin
Contact:

Re: Long fights

Post by erik »

Jim of Seattle wrote:
15-16 puzzle wrote:
I don't see any need to implement this idea.
That's awfully dismissive of you. Why not? I think I've made a pretty compelling case for it adding a lot of value and with an extremely low impact to the regular fight process.
Because I can't come up with a good way to complete this sentence:

If a quarterly, three-week-long fight is not added to the format, then _________________ would happen, and that would be a bad for Songfight.
Eric Y.
Ice Cream Man
Posts: 1797
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 12:36 pm

Re: Long fights

Post by Eric Y. »

15-16 puzzle wrote:I don't see any need to implement this idea.
Jim of Seattle wrote:Why not? I think I've made a pretty compelling case for it adding a lot of value...
there are a great number of things that could be done to improve the songfight! experience for certain people, or even for the community as a whole. spud has been hard at work for months with things like the sortable archive and the individual band pages and the art archive and etc. ... but in the time i've been here (nearly a year now) i've seen countless suggestions about re-structuring the way the competition itself works, or the voting, or whatever, and they have consistently been ignored. it seems the policy is, if it ain't baroque, don't fix it.
User avatar
thehipcola
Ice Cream Man
Posts: 1062
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:51 am
Instruments: The things what make sounds.
Recording Method: LA610mk2 into UAD Apollo 8p into Cubase/LUNA/Reaper/Ableton/Reason/Maschine
Submitting as: thehipcolaredcargertFlamingTigershotpounderOGLawnDartsFussyBritchesGapingMaw
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Contact:

Post by thehipcola »

15-16, is that your litmus test which qualifies any potential change in your world? Only if the change in question fixes something? How exceptionally status quo.... where is your sense of adventure? :)

I think the case for fostering more collab's with a bit more time is a great one.

This in no way implies that there is anything WRONG with how things are here now...to be clear.



Cheers,
PinV :!:
User avatar
erik
Jump
Posts: 2341
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:06 am
Submitting as: 15-16 puzzle
Location: Austin
Contact:

Post by erik »

Peaks In Valleys wrote:15-16, is that your litmus test which qualifies any potential change in your world? Only if the change in question fixes something? How exceptionally status quo.... where is your sense of adventure? :)

I think the case for fostering more collab's with a bit more time is a great one.

This in no way implies that there is anything WRONG with how things are here now...to be clear.



Cheers,
PinV :!:
You are imagining me saying things that I have never said.
User avatar
king_arthur
Ice Cream Man
Posts: 1752
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 6:56 am
Instruments: guitar, vocals, bass, BIAB, keyboards (synth anything)
Recording Method: Tascam DP-24SD
Submitting as: King Arthur
Pronouns: he/him
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Contact:

Post by king_arthur »

Well, back when we were getting 40+ entries in a single fight, I think a bunch of people suggested various options for having multiple fights each week, and that was implemented.

If a quarterly, three-week-long fight is not added to the format, then people who are considering participating will continue to be turned off by the one-week timeline, coming back with things like "Oh, well our band doesn't meet often enough to enable us to really put anything together in a week, but sounds fun. Oh well." This would happen, and that would be a bad for Songfight. Look at it this way: the one-week deadline favors those who take shortcuts, like drum machines, MIDI horns and other unspeakable musical travesties...

Charles
"...one does not write in dactylic hexameter purely by accident..." - poetic designs
User avatar
Leaf
Jump
Posts: 2438
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 2:19 pm
Instruments: Drums, guitar, bass, vocals.
Recording Method: Cubase
Submitting as: Leaf 62, Gert, Boon Liver, Leaf and Twig, Tom Skillman, A bunch of other stuff.
Location: Campbell River, B.C.
Contact:

Post by Leaf »

15-16 puzzle wrote: You are imagining me saying things that I have never said.


That's cause you typed them you sneaky man.


Sorry. Couldn't resist that.


I should probably go home rather than sit here at my desk making lame ass jokes on the internet....


but I need the hours, and no ones watching.


Oh. Here's a good one:

I've been "promoted" to "assistant IT manager". Along with being the HR manager, the back up operations manager and the what ever else we can find for you to do that is completely unrelated to your daily tasks manager.


... when does the pay raise kick in?


HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
...you obviously don't know the fish business.


... this is a complaint of sorts... but probably the wrong kind for this thread... doot di do.
Post Reply