I agree and I think part of the point here is that this race shows that we have two viable candidates. I think 'fighting for the nomination' is completely different from the definition of 'fighting a war' and I think thats a weak analogy.erik wrote:I dunno, I think that Hillary being in the race up until a certain point is a good thing for the Democratic party. It keeps their party in the news, it keeps people talking, and it keeps focus away from the Republicans. I don't know if that makes for a good leader, but it makes her an awesome wingman.mico saudad wrote:She is seen as a "fighter" and someone who doesn't ever give up no matter what the reality is. Haven't we figured out that's not really what we should be looking for in a leader right now?
What sucks is that while Obama has more delegates and everybody is crying that she should get out of the race... everyone forgets that Ohio and Florida practically have no say...
So when anyone says that he's doing so much better than her WHILE she is still WINNING STATES I feel compelled to point out that there are at least two states who 'dont count'