maybe we ran out of good ones?
-
- Beat It
- Posts: 5348
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:33 am
- Instruments: Bass, keyboards, singin', guitar
- Submitting as: Johnny Cashpoint
- Location: London, Engerllaaannnddd
- Contact:
And from here, it is but a short jig to 'why are instrumentals frowned upon'? Is it some unwritten law that all threads on Songfight will ventually end up in this debate????
I do find it surprising that people complain that they don't feel inspired by the titles. there will be periods where you are and periods where you aren't. That's the nature of having someone else think up the titles. Because I am nice, for anyone struggling, here are the ideas I had this week (minus the one I am going to go with)
Snow Fort - 'Neptunes' style beat song about Tony Montana's cocaine-infested ranch, as per the end of 'Scarface'.
Tank Top - sweet boy 'n' guitar 'n' weird noises song about the legend of 70s porn (I already did an AAD song 'Porn Stars of the Seventies' about gay porn stars which featured the line 'Give me tank tops and stripy sports socks ...' so I happily offer this up for a heterosexual take!)
Turn the Power On - just screams for a Grandaddy style song about post-apocalyptic, breakdown of society, type song. Leaving this one because I already covered the subject matter in 'Upcoming Downtime' and because I don't have the skill to pull off a Grandaddy song.
Man Speaking German - I have a cool idea for this one, as stated elsewhere. Otherwise there's room for a song about Hitler (in the style of brecht's 'Arturo Ui', or a song taking digs at newspapers in the sense of the real horrors in the world, but the headlines are always shallow, emotion nigglers, like 'At 6.00! American Man Wakes from Coma after 16 years and now only speaks German'!
Not trying to show off, these are all fairly literal. If anyone wants them, they're welcome to them.
j$
I do find it surprising that people complain that they don't feel inspired by the titles. there will be periods where you are and periods where you aren't. That's the nature of having someone else think up the titles. Because I am nice, for anyone struggling, here are the ideas I had this week (minus the one I am going to go with)
Snow Fort - 'Neptunes' style beat song about Tony Montana's cocaine-infested ranch, as per the end of 'Scarface'.
Tank Top - sweet boy 'n' guitar 'n' weird noises song about the legend of 70s porn (I already did an AAD song 'Porn Stars of the Seventies' about gay porn stars which featured the line 'Give me tank tops and stripy sports socks ...' so I happily offer this up for a heterosexual take!)
Turn the Power On - just screams for a Grandaddy style song about post-apocalyptic, breakdown of society, type song. Leaving this one because I already covered the subject matter in 'Upcoming Downtime' and because I don't have the skill to pull off a Grandaddy song.
Man Speaking German - I have a cool idea for this one, as stated elsewhere. Otherwise there's room for a song about Hitler (in the style of brecht's 'Arturo Ui', or a song taking digs at newspapers in the sense of the real horrors in the world, but the headlines are always shallow, emotion nigglers, like 'At 6.00! American Man Wakes from Coma after 16 years and now only speaks German'!
Not trying to show off, these are all fairly literal. If anyone wants them, they're welcome to them.
j$
- erik
- Jump
- Posts: 2341
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:06 am
- Submitting as: 15-16 puzzle
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
I don't think the wording of the FAQ is ambiguous at all. I think it's worded so that songs which do not include the title in the lyrics are welcome, but also worded to suggest that you should write a song for the title that is provided.
If the title is "Let's Learn to Do the Cabbage Patch" and you write a song about leprechauns from Brazil who want to go to outer space, I don't think you're really following the guidelines of songfight. Which is not to say that every song has to be a straight-up literal interpretation of the title, but there should be some connection, some reason why your song has the same title as the one posted to songfight.
If the title is "Let's Learn to Do the Cabbage Patch" and you write a song about leprechauns from Brazil who want to go to outer space, I don't think you're really following the guidelines of songfight. Which is not to say that every song has to be a straight-up literal interpretation of the title, but there should be some connection, some reason why your song has the same title as the one posted to songfight.
-
- Beat It
- Posts: 5348
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:33 am
- Instruments: Bass, keyboards, singin', guitar
- Submitting as: Johnny Cashpoint
- Location: London, Engerllaaannnddd
- Contact:
15-16 puzzle wrote:........ but there should be some connection, some reason why your song has the same title as the one posted to songfight.
jack shite wrote:if for no other reason to sort of validate the fact you actually made a new song for the week and didn't just submit something recycled.
johnny cashpoint, trying to avert a major three-page deja-vu experience, had already wrote:And from here, it is but a short jig to 'why are instrumentals frowned upon'? Is it some unwritten law that all threads on Songfight will 'ventually end up in this debate????
-
- Panama
- Posts: 924
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 5:51 pm
- Instruments: Guitar, Bass, Drums, Mandolin all graded on a sliding scale
- Recording Method: Mixer to a Fostex D-160
- Location: Somewhere in a place called the Midwest
Exhibit Abzl wrote:It would also be just as easy to say "write a song containing the vegetable of your choice" but, well, I do hope you see why your two things are different. A song doesn't have to "contain" its title (in the lyrics, I assume you mean) to validate it.
A good sidefight BTW in "The Jig is Up". Also I think complaining about the titles is akin to looking a gift horse in the mouth.
jb wrote:Dan-O has a point.
JB
-
- Panama
- Posts: 924
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 5:51 pm
- Instruments: Guitar, Bass, Drums, Mandolin all graded on a sliding scale
- Recording Method: Mixer to a Fostex D-160
- Location: Somewhere in a place called the Midwest
Not to split hairs but Deshead did say "based on" before he said "ambiguous". And then of course theirs always this.15-16 puzzle wrote:I don't think the wording of the FAQ is ambiguous at all. I think it's worded so that songs which do not include the title in the lyrics are welcome, but also worded to suggest that you should write a song for the title that is provided.
Pronunciation: am-'bi-gy&-w&s
Function: adjective
Etymology: Latin ambiguus, from ambigere to be undecided, from ambi- + agere to drive -- more at AGENT
1 a : doubtful or uncertain especially from obscurity or indistinctness <eyes of an ambiguous color> b : INEXPLICABLE
2 : capable of being understood in two or more possible senses or ways
But I'm sure you were already aware of the second definition.
jb wrote:Dan-O has a point.
JB
-
- Mr. Beast
- Posts: 2263
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 12:43 pm
- Instruments: Guitar/bass/keys
- Recording Method: Various. Mostly Garageband these days, actually.
- Submitting as: Jim Tyrrell
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
-
- Beat It
- Posts: 5348
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:33 am
- Instruments: Bass, keyboards, singin', guitar
- Submitting as: Johnny Cashpoint
- Location: London, Engerllaaannnddd
- Contact:
I know. TATJ. I was actually responding to Jack, making the point (or trying to) that discussing the validity of titles is as unresolvable as discussing the validity of instrumentals. I thought a little humour would lighten up a rather too worthy thread. I was either wrong or not funny.15-16 puzzle wrote:I wasn't repeating what you had said, because I don't think instrumentals are necessarily bad. I was commenting on something different, which was that just because you aren't required to use the title in lyrics doesn't mean that you should feel free to write anything you want and send it in.
-
- Panama
- Posts: 924
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 5:51 pm
- Instruments: Guitar, Bass, Drums, Mandolin all graded on a sliding scale
- Recording Method: Mixer to a Fostex D-160
- Location: Somewhere in a place called the Midwest
I tried the "link", @ 15-16, several times, it didn't work.deshead wrote:I laughed.j$ wrote:I was either wrong or not funny.
I also linked the 18 possible definitions for for the word "based", but I guess my intent there was ambiguous.Dan-O wrote:Not to split hairs but Deshead did say "based on" before he said "ambiguous".
Heh.
Hmm.
jb wrote:Dan-O has a point.
JB
- erik
- Jump
- Posts: 2341
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:06 am
- Submitting as: 15-16 puzzle
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
I can read. I also know what ambiguous means. I can't fathom more than one interpretation of the sentence in question. I think it's <i>vague</i> on purpose to be as accomodating as possible, but not at all ambiguous.Dan-O from Five-O wrote:
Not to split hairs but Deshead did say "based on" before he said "ambiguous".
-
- Panama
- Posts: 924
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 5:51 pm
- Instruments: Guitar, Bass, Drums, Mandolin all graded on a sliding scale
- Recording Method: Mixer to a Fostex D-160
- Location: Somewhere in a place called the Midwest
At the risk of this getting ugly, and boring for others, you don't think being "as accomodating as possible" and leaving something that is "capable of being understood in two or more possible senses or ways" is "at all ambiguous"?15-16 puzzle wrote:I can read. I also know what ambiguous means. I can't fathom more than one interpretation of the sentence in question. I think it's <i>vague</i> on purpose to be as accomodating as possible, but not at all ambiguous.Dan-O from Five-O wrote:
Not to split hairs but Deshead did say "based on" before he said "ambiguous".
jb wrote:Dan-O has a point.
JB
- erik
- Jump
- Posts: 2341
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:06 am
- Submitting as: 15-16 puzzle
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
In an effort to end this, I will restate yet again that I don't think that the FAQ is ambiguous. I will also restate that it is vague, which is not the same thing as ambiguous. I do not see another interpretation besides "Write a song that has some connection to the given title". If you're going to allow misinterpretations of what is stated to count as valid alternate meanings, then there is not a single thing that isn't ambiguous, and the word loses all meaning. If you would like me to repeat this all again, you can pm me.
-
- Panama
- Posts: 924
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 5:51 pm
- Instruments: Guitar, Bass, Drums, Mandolin all graded on a sliding scale
- Recording Method: Mixer to a Fostex D-160
- Location: Somewhere in a place called the Midwest
OK, it's ended.15-16 puzzle wrote:In an effort to end this, I will restate yet again that I don't think
Nah that's just mean on my part, and I am mostly just trying to rile you up anyway. You're pretty easy to do that to from what I've seen. I do respect you're opinion, and agree with a lot of the time it's just not right now.
For instance take a title like "You Rock". You might right a song about how you think someone "Rocks" in the many ways that could be intepreted like "Man that guitarist rocks" or "That dress she's wearing rocks". And I might write a song like "You rock" as in you stupid, incapabale of reason and thought, inanimate piece of igneous. Deshead might write a song about two people being "Thick as Bricks". Though technically not a rock, a brick is rock like and would have a connection to the title.
Hence "capable of being understood in two or more possible senses or ways". Hence "ambiguous". Hence "vague".
My point is that anything that can be interpreted in multiple ways is inherently vague. If there was only one way to interpret something, that would be specific.
jb wrote:Dan-O has a point.
JB
- erik
- Jump
- Posts: 2341
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:06 am
- Submitting as: 15-16 puzzle
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
I'm pretty hard to rile up. I'm pretty easy to get talking. If you really think you've upset me, you're both terribly mistaken and a bit full of yourself.Dan-O from Five-O wrote:I am mostly just trying to rile you up anyway. You're pretty easy to do that to from what I've seen. I do respect you're opinion, and agree with a lot of the time it's just not right now.
- erik
- Jump
- Posts: 2341
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:06 am
- Submitting as: 15-16 puzzle
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
Re: maybe we ran out of good ones?
In an effort to rerail the conversation, it seems to me that new title excitement is inversely proportional to how long one has been at songfight. Like it seems everyone liked the title(s) the first week they showed up.john m wrote:Is it just me, or have the titles for the last month been terrible? I've had time to write/record, but these titles drive me away.
-
- Mean Street
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 3:09 pm